FFS Logo

Which Pension Funds Consistently Under Perform?

Figaro's Fund Analysis of a fund manager's past performance; quantifies how much value  a fund manager’s investment style has added during both favourable and unfavourable market conditions. 

 

Pension Performance Table

  

Zurich Balanced Managed   fund out-performed the Balanced Managed Sector on 76% of occasions, on average adding 2.81% p.a.     

 

Scottish Provident's Managed  fund under-performed the Balanced Managed Sector on 76% of occasions, on average losing   2.51% p.a.       

 

 

Provider

Out Performance

%

Under Performance

%

Value   Added     p.a.

Zurich

76

24

 2.81

Prudential

49

51

1.15

Standard Life

59

41

0.92

Scottish Widows

60

40

0.80

L&G

51

49

0.75

Friends Provident

65

35

0.09

Scottish Equitable

49

51

-              0.02

Lloyds TSB

45

55

-              0.22

Countrywide

41

59

-              0.39

NPI

37

63

-              0.48

MGM

29

71

-              0.77

Provident Mutual

24

76

-              0.84

Barclays Life

43

57

-              0.87

HSBC Life

39

61

-              0.91

London Life

43

57

-              0.93

Commercial Union

24

76

-              0.96

General Accident

24

76

-              0.96

Norwich Union

49

51

-              0.97

Pearl

41

59

-              1.07

Clerical Medical

51

49

-              1.30

AXA (ex Sun Life)

37

63

-              1.38

Canada life

39

61

-              1.59

AXA Equity & Law

35

65

-              1.62

Scottish Life

27

73

-              1.75

Equitable Life

24

76

-              1.84

Halifax

24

76

-              1.84

Royal Scottish

14

86

-              2.26

Scottish Mutual

27

73

-              2.35

Friends Prov Stewardship

27

73

-              2.37

NatWest

29

71

-              2.43

Scottish Provident

24

76

-              2.51

 

  Low Pension Charges

 

Stakeholder pension plans were introduced by the Government to offer investors a ‘no‑frills’ and therefore low cost pension plan.  The introduction of these plans had the effect of bringing down charges on non-stakeholder plans.     

 

If you have an old, out-dated pension plan with high charges you should probably transfer your pension fund to one with lower charges, or one that offers access to a wider range of the best funds.    

 

Provider 

% Out Performance 

 % Under Performance 

Value Added

% p.a. 

 

 

 

 

Example Old-Style Pension 

          96  

  -    8.40 

 

 

Charges should not be seen as the deciding factor on choosing a pension; as having access to the best funds will probably have an even greater effect on your retirement income. However, the old style pension fund above under-performed the Sector Average on 96% of occaisions, losing on average 8.40% p.a.

 

 

Fund Performance Analysis is performed by Figaro for 49 periods ending 31st January 2010, on data supplied by Morningstar. Whilst Figaro take great care in compiling the figures and information shown, no liability can be accepted for any error or omission.

 

Past Performance  is not necessarily a guide to future performance.

Find Out - How Much

your  fund

manager has

contributed

to your pension!

 

FREE Analysis & Report

Figaro has taken fund performance analysis a step further
The Sunday Times 28 May 2000

...  could be as useful to an investor as a Global Positioning satelite is to a yachtsman in the Southern Ocean.

The Times 20th May 2000

 



 

 

 

 

Figaro -  Unbelievably powerful strategies achieving outstanding investment performance

Performance  Table

Most fund managers

under-perform

Is your fund manager 

making or losing

you money?

 

Should you trust a bank

to invest your pension?