Which Pension Funds Consistently Under
Perform?
Figaro's Fund Analysis of a fund manager's past performance; quantifies how much
value a fund manager’s investment style has added during both favourable and unfavourable market
conditions.
Pension Performance Table
Zurich Balanced Managed fund out-performed the Balanced Managed Sector on 76% of occasions, on
average adding 2.81% p.a.
Scottish Provident's Managed fund under-performed the Balanced Managed Sector on 76% of occasions, on
average losing
2.51%
p.a.
Low Pension Charges
Stakeholder
pension plans were introduced by the Government to offer investors a ‘no‑frills’ and therefore low cost pension
plan. The introduction of these plans had the effect of bringing down charges on non-stakeholder
plans.
If you have
an old, out-dated pension plan with high charges you should probably transfer your pension fund to one with lower charges, or
one that offers access to a wider range of the best funds.
|
Provider
|
% Out
Performance
|
% Under Performance
|
Value Added
% p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example Old-Style
Pension
|
4
|
96
|
- 8.40
|
Charges should not be seen as the deciding factor on choosing a pension; as having access to the
best funds will probably have an even greater effect on your retirement income. However, the old style pension fund above under-performed the Sector Average on 96% of occaisions, losing on average 8.40%
p.a.
Fund Performance Analysis
is performed by Figaro for 49 periods ending 31st January 2010, on data supplied
by Morningstar. Whilst Figaro take great care in compiling the figures and information shown, no
liability can be accepted for any error or omission.
Past
Performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance.
|