Pearl - Named & Shamed
For Consistent Under Performance
Pearl
Managed Fund underperformed on 76%
of occasions by an average of 1.49%
p.a.
Pearl Balanced
Managed fund is used for comparison and drawn from the
Balanced Managed Sector; as this is usually a fair
representation of a firm’s investment abilities across a range
of asset types.
The Trend
Graphs that follow show how
Pearl
Balanced Managed fund has underperformed other funds
within the Balanced Managed Sector over a series of 48, 1 year
investment periods, taken at one-month intervals.
-
Historical performance is to the left and current
performance to the right of the
graph.
-
White bars are periods of negative and green positive
returns.
So, how can we
tell
Pearl fund
management is
ineffective?
This fund is in the
Balanced Managed Sector:
Sectors are collections of funds which have been grouped
together by the ABI (Association of British Insurers), with the
aim of assisting comparison with other funds sharing a common
purpose.
Sector Return
- The movement of assets within a Sector will heavily influence
the return of a fund,
regardless of whether the fund manager is adding
value.
By looking at the
investment return of the Balanced Managed Sector below; when
viewed over the same period as
Pearl's
fund, we can see a very similar performance profile; with the
fund providing positive returns at the same time as the
Sector.
Then
by subtracting the Sector Return from the Fund's Return
we can see the value added by the Fund
Manager.
This
shows the
Pearl
fund significantly and consistently
underperforming other funds in the same
Sector.
The story gets worse!
By comparing the fund with the Sector; we are effectively
comparing this fund with a very average fund.
Fraser Financial Services
use the same fund analysis techniques to identify the best fund
managers … those performing most consistently - adding the
greatest value for investors.
Fraser Financial Services
offer a pension review service. If you have a pension with
|